Prognostic factors associated with mortality in patients with cancer and febrile neutropenia.

Factores pronósticos relacionados con la mortalidad en pacientes con cáncer y neutropenia febril.

Main Article Content

Pedro Ramos
Ricardo Sánchez
Óscar Gamboa
Andrés Felipe Cardona
Abstract

Introduction: Febrile neutropenia (FN) patients represent a heterogeneous population having a variable risk of developing complications, including death. Objectives: Describing clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of FN patients, as well as the variables influencing mortality. Materials and methods: An ambidirectional study was made to include information concerning 270 patients and 412 episodes of FN which was collected from the 1st May 2001 to the 31st March 2008 at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) in Bogotá, Colombia. All the patients included in the study had confirmed neoplasia, were over 18 years old and had been diagnosed with a FN. Demographic, microbiological and clinical variables concerning the patients’ treatment and final outcome were evaluated. The variables modifying overall survival were submitted to univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The patients’ average age was 41.6 years; bacteremia incidence was 26.5%, microbiological findings being most frequent in Gram-negative germ haemocultures. The FN mortality rate was 7.3 per 100,000 patients per day and univariate analysis of variables significantly associated with mortality revealed the following hazard ratios (HR): mental state (HR 13.34, 6.34-32.82 95%CI), hypotension (HR 5.4, 2.77-10.83 95%CI), renal failure (HR 5.40, 2.40-12.12 95%CI), dehydration (HR 6.67, 3.40-13.08 95%CI), respiratory failure (HR 9.82, 8.48-20.01 95%CI) and fungemia (HR 4.88,4.16-16.30 95%CI). Both univariate and multivariate analysis rejected bacteremia being associated with mortality. Mortality was only modified by respiratory failure in multivariate analysis (HR 4.23, 1.87-9.59 95%CI), compared to altered mental state (HR 3.96, 1.61-9.75 95%CI) and dehydration (HR 2.49, 1.10-5.65 95%CI). Conclusions: The mortality rate due to FN was comparable to that reported in the medical literature. Bacteremia did not modify mortality; however, it did modify other factors which could support identifying high risk patients.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biographies (SEE)

Pedro Ramos, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Departamento de Oncología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Bogotá, Colombia).

Ricardo Sánchez, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología

Grupo de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Bogotá, Colombia). Subdirección de Investigaciones y Salud Pública, Promoción y Prevención; Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Bogotá, Colombia).

Óscar Gamboa, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología

Subdirección de Investigaciones y Salud Pública, Promoción y Prevención; Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Bogotá, Colombia).

Andrés Felipe Cardona, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá ; Fundación para la Investigación Clínica y Molecular Aplicada del Cáncer (FICMAC)

Grupo Oncología Clínica y Traslacional, Instituto de Oncología, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (Bogotá, Colombia). Fundación para la Investigación Clínica y Molecular Aplicada del Cáncer (FICMAC) (Bogotá, Colombia).

References

Bodey GP, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med. 1966;64(2):328-340.

Pizzo PA, Robichaud KJ, Gill FA, Witebsky FG. Empiric antibiotic and antifungal therapy for cancer patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia. Am J Med. 1982;72(1):101-111.

Schimpff S, Satterlee W, Young VM, Serpick A. Empiric therapy with carbenicillin and gentamicin for febrile patients with cancer and granulocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 1971;284(19):1061-1065.

Pizzo PA, Robichaud KJ, Gill FA, Witebsky FG, et al. Duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. Am J Med. 1979;67(2):194-200.

EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group. Empiric antifungal therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Am J Med. 1989;86(6 Pt 1):668-672.

Vancomycin added to empirical combination antibiotic therapy for fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group and the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group. J Infect Dis. 1991 May;163(5):951-8. Erratum in: J Infect Dis. 1991 Oct;164(4):832.

Rolston KV. The Infectious Diseases Society of America 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in patients with cancer and neutropenia: salient features and comments. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 15;39 Suppl 1:S44-8.

Wade JC, Glasmacher A. Vancomycin does not benefit persistently febrile neutropenic people with cancer.. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30(1):119-26.

Freifeld A, Sankaranarayanan J, Ullrich F, Sun J. Clinical practice patterns of managing low-risk adult febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy in the USA. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(2):181-91.

Talcott JA, Finberg R, Mayer RJ, Goldman L. The medical course of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Clinical identification of a low-risk subgroup at presentation. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(12):2561-2568.

Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, Boyer M, et al. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(16):3038-3051.

Uys A, Rapoport BL, Anderson R. Febrile neutropenia: a prospective study to validate the Multinational Association of Supportive Care of Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12(8):555-560.

Gómez-Roca C, Rivero M, Krupitzki H, Novillo A, Lapadula MM, et al. Factores de mal pronóstico en pacientes internados con neutropenia al inicio del episodio febril. Medicina (B. Aires). 2006;66(5):385-391.

Carmona Bayonas A, Herrero JA, Martínez J, Marín M, et al. Neutropenia febril: análisis de los factores pronósticos y el tratamiento adaptado al riesgo. Revisión crítica. Oncología. 2006;29(5):206-218. 15. Puentes GA, Quiroga C, Álvarez CA, Támara JR, Ruiz A. Características demográficas, morbilidad y mortalidad de los pacientes adultos con neutropenia febril tratados con cefepima. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2012;29(3):322-328.

Segal BH, Freifeld AG, Baden LR, Brown AE, Casper C, Dubberke E, et al. Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6(2):122-74.

Elting LS, Rubenstein EB, Rolston KV, Bodey GP. Outcomes of bacteremia in patients with cancer and neutropenia: observations from two decades of epidemiological and clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(2):247-59.

Cortés JA, Cuervo S, Gómez CA, Bermúdez D, Martínez T, Arroyo P. Febrile neutropenia in the tropics: a description of clinical and microbiological findings and their impact on inappropriate therapy currently used at an oncologicy reference center in Colombia. Biomédica. 2013;33(1). (en prensa)

Schwenk A, Schlottmann S, Kremer G, Diehl V, Salzberger B, Ward L. Fever and sepsis during neutropenia are associated with expansion of extracellular and loss of intracellular water. Clin Nutr. 2000 Feb;19(1):35-41.

Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, Vidal L, Lawrie TA, van de Wetering MD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD004386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004386.pub3.

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |