Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Relative dose intensity of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with breast cáncer.

Intensidad de dosis relativa de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante en pacientes ancianas con cáncer de mama.




Section
Original articles

How to Cite
Relative dose intensity of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with breast cáncer.
Rev. colomb. hematol. oncol. [Internet]. 2020 Feb. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];7(1):11-7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.51643/22562915.14

Dimensions
PlumX
Jesús Sánchez

    Tomás Sánchez Villegas,

    Internista, oncólogo clínico. Clínica Vida (Medellín, Colombia).


    Jesús Sánchez,

    Internista, oncólogo clínico. Magíster en epidemiología clínica. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Bogotá, D.C., Colombia).


    Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant tumor in the world. People older than 65 years represent a group, which gathers most of the deaths and survivors of this disease. It has been published previously that elderly people often receive a suboptimal cancer treatment. Objetive: Describe dose intensity of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the elderly people, the factors that modify this parameter or the consequences of having suboptimal dose intensity. Methods: This is an observational study descriptive retrospective of breast cancer patients older than 65 years old that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología between 2013 and 2015. We did a medical record review and estimated the summation dose intensity with the previously published Hryniuk’s formula. We also did an exploratory bivariate analysis to find conditions that could modify the dose intensity value. Results: Between august of 2013 and september of 2015, 72 patients were included. 44.4% of the patients presented in stage IIIB. The most frequent used chemotherapy scheme was AC-T in 45.8% of cases. El 38.8% reached the threshold of 85% or more. The global pathological complete response was of 16.39%. The biggest pathological response was in patient with overexpression of HER2 the response was 23.5%, and the triple negative subgroup was 23% and luminal was 11.36%. Conclusion: Our study supports the fact that elderly people often receive a suboptimal antineoplastic treatment. We couldn’t demonstrate a demographic or clinic factor that could influence the dose intensity of this population, nevertheless we found a trend towards a lower complete pathological response in the lowest dose intensities especially in the most chemo sensitive tumors.


    Article visits 319 | PDF visits 303


    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68:394-424.
    2. Bray F, Ren J-S, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cáncer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. International Journal of Cancer. 2013;132(5):1133-45.
    3. Colombia, Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Análisis de Situación de Salud (ASIS) Colombia 2015. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; 2015.
    4. OMS. Informe mundial sobre el envejecimiento y la salud [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2016 jul 27]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/es/
    5. Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, et al. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2758-65.
    6. Karuturi M, VanderWalde N, Muss H. Approach and management of breast cancer in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2016;32(1):133-53.
    7. VanderWalde A, Hurria A. Early breast cancer in the older woman. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28(1):73-91.
    8. Schairer C, Mink PJ, Carroll L, Devesa SS. Probabilities of death from breast cancer and other causes among female breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 sep 1;96(17):1311-21.
    9. Goodwin JS. Factors affecting the diagnosis and treatment of older persons with cancer. In: Balducci L, Lyman GH, Ershler WB. Comprehensive geriatric oncology. London: Harwood; 1998. p. 115-21.
    10. Samet JM, Junt WC, Key C, Humble C, Goodwin JS. Choices of cancer therapy varies with age of patient. JAMA. 1986;255: 3385-90.
    11. Turner NJ, Haward RA, Mulley GP, Selby PJ. Cancer in old age - is it inadequately investigated and treated? BMJ.1999;319:309-12.
    12. Owusu C, Lash TL, Silliman RA. Effect of undertreatment on the disparity in age-related breast cancer-specific survival among older women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102(2):227-36.
    13. Allemani C, Storm H, Voogd AC, Holli K, Izarzugaza I, TorrellaRamos A, et al. Variation in “standard care” for breast cáncer across Europe: a Eurocare-3 high resolution study. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(9):1528-36.
    14. Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JPA. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(3):188-94.
    15. Van der Hage JA, Van de Velde CJ, Julien JP, Tubiana-Hulin M, Vandervelden C, Duchateau L. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902. J Clin Oncol. 200;19(22):4224-37.
    16. Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W, Hortobagyi GN, Gianni L, von Minckwitz G, et al. Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):814-9.
    17. Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, Scholl S, Makris A, Valagussa P, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1940-9.
    18. Hryniuk W, Frei E, Wright FA. A single scale for comparing doseintensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(9):3137-47.
    19. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P. Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1981;304(1):10-5.
    20. Hryniuk W, Levine MN. Analysis of dose intensity for adjuvant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4(8):1162-70.
    21. Chirivella I, Bermejo B, Insa A, Pérez-Fidalgo A, Magro A, Rosello S, et al. Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cáncer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(3):479-84.
    22. Oladipo O, Coyle V, McAleer JJ, McKenna S. Achieving optimal dose intensity with adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: a 10-year retrospective study in a UK institution. Breast J. 2012;18(1):16-22.
    23. Franceschini G, Terribile D, Magno S, Fabbri C, D’Alba PF, Chiesa F, et al. Update in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007;11(5):283-9.
    24. Shahrokni A, Wu AJ, Carter J, Lichtman SM. Long-term toxicity of cancer treatment in older patients. Clin Geriatr Med.2016;32(1):63-80.
    25. Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8):2672-85.
    26. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, Smith R, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(22):4165-74.
    27. Chagpar AB, Middleton LP, Sahin AA, Dempsey P, Buzdar AU, Mirza AN, et al. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):257-64.
    28. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA, Ziltsova EK, Ivanov VG, Bozhok AA, et al. Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(2):244-54.
    29. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164-72.
    30. Colleoni M, Viale G, Zahrieh D, Pruneri G, Gentilini O, Veronesi P, et al. Chemotherapy is more effective in patients with breast cancer not expressing steroid hormone receptors. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(19):6622-8.
    31. Robidoux A, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer CE, Azar CA, Atkins JN, et al. Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 nov;14(12):1183-92.
    32. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375(9712):377-84.
    33. Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer J U, et al. Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):135-44.
    34. Faneyte IF, Schrama J G, Peterse JL, Remijnse PL, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ. Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer. 2003;88(3):406-12.
    35. Broglio KR, Quintana M, Foster M, Olinger M, McGlothlin A, Berry SM, et al. Association of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer with long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(6):751-60.
    Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |